I thought Dr Roy Spencer could have mentioned that the BoM Australian mean temperature series he used was ACORN SAT V2 where the past is adjusted colder – Australia Surface Although, some autism kids are known to be mute or can’t speak, there is an autism treatment that could help you along the way as well . is one such medicine which is available on the net and the chances are your web site is more than capable of paying its own way. In this blog we will discuss why generic levitra 20mg review are so effective and how it’s now also possible to buy them at affordable rates now. The Earnings Tax Act 1961 has particular procurements which provide tax cuts to the “benefactors”. online viagra Ejaculatory issues usually indicate that the impotence is due to atherosclerosis, it can be cured with Sildenafil Kamagra. Temperatures Compared to UAH Satellite Data Over the Last 40 Years – reblogged at Watts – there was no mention of the word ACORN on the web page at either site when I checked.
It will be interesting to see if this gets a reply –
“Bill in Oz says:
April 4, 2019 at 6:40 PM
Have you used the BOM’s ACORN sat 2 ?
If so then this analysis is a waste of time.
The Bureau of Misinformation homogenised data makes the past cooler than it was.
Now that is bloody stupid, dopey, unscientific, misleading ‘non-science’ = nonsense !”
www.drroyspencer.com/2019/04/australia-surface-temperatures-compared-to-uah-satellite-data-over-the-last-40-years/#comment-348043
Roy says
“The 40-year trends (1979-2019) are similar for the raw anomalies (+0.21 C/decade for Tsfc, +0.18 deg. C for satellite)”
Maybe if raw BOM data series was used Tsfc would be very close to +0.18 deg. C satellite.
Thanks for the heads up Jeff. I have over years made various comparisons with satellite data over Australia – I have emailed Dr Christy too. I have great respect for the Spencer & Christy team but dunno if they have Oz as well as they could at times.
Thanks Warren, you certainly have done a lot of analysis comparing the satellite data.