www.abc.net.au/newsradio/
This was 7pm AEST Monday 3 Nov.
As of 4am on 4 Nov – the No vote was 90%.
Spread the word of this poll.
www.abc.net.au/newsradio/
This was 7pm AEST Monday 3 Nov.
As of 4am on 4 Nov – the No vote was 90%.
Spread the word of this poll.
No. Absolutely NOT
NO! The U.N. is a political organization, not a scientific organization. As a political organization it has demonstrated that it is incompetent, ineffective, stupid, chicken-hearted and corrupt. I see no reason to place any faith in it’s science.
This is in addition to the fact that as a scientist having studied this matter, it is obvious that the climate changes we are and have been seeing are within natural limits and readily explainable by standard climate science independent of carbon dioxide levels.
It seems that the IPCC cannot do simple 5th grade math. The only example I can use to explain it is like the budget of the USA. President’s always claim that their budget will eventually balance, but only when they’re out of office for years. For those that actually do any research on this their numbers have never added up or approached reality.
‘projectories’
Not content with abusing the science, they have to abuse the English language as well.
Urban dictionary;
Projectory
In a business environment, the path a project will take on its way to completion.
voted and shared on FB!!
That was quick – ABC poll consigned to the cemetery –
www.abc.net.au/newsradio/polls/archive/
I am surprised the poll would not have drummed up more Greens and GetUp support. Only 279 votes for YES in all Australia ???
I am surprised they left it up so long, when the trend was apparent early. The NO vote was was running in low 70’s almost from the start.
It seems that regular readers of the web site aren’t at all in tune with the dogma.
Spot on wazsah!
But wot really surprises me isn’t that the poll results themselves haven’t been deep-sixed, quite unforgivably, neither has the actual size of the response
Ho, ho, ho!
Makes you wonder which particular gulag the responsible apparatchik/s is/are about to be bound
I do so love the smell of napalm in the morning
Obviously turned off by “their ABC” when they didn’t receive the “correct” result. Now why aren’t we surprised?
Poll now gone and another one about political advertising. I do do not want the greens to advertise their thoughtless rubbish about saving the planet. The greens think they are superior to nature but in fact they are just plain stupid.
The IPCC is absolutely wrong.
Firstly, looking at the data on climate of the past, nobody would ever suspect CO2 played any part in changing the climate of Earth over geologic time.
Secondly, the IPCC blames the 3% of the total CO2 entering the atmosphere each year from human activity as the key driver of climate change and cause of catastrophic global warming. This man-made 3% of CO2 emissions is responsible for only about 0.11% of the greenhouse effect. Propositions of changing, or rather destroying, the global energy system because of this tiny minuscule human contribution, in face of the large short-term and long-term natural fluctuations of atmospheric CO2, are utterly irresponsible.
Co2 caused “Climate Change” is the 21st century Piltdown Hoax. The only “scientists” who believe that faith-based religious cult nonsense are those whose livelihoods depend upon it. As soon as they retire they defect to the Climate realists faction.