Many fatalities from eruption on Mt Ontake – what geophysical warning signs were there?

Early reports over the weekend like this from the BBC said [The question of no warning is harder to answer. Volcanologists point out this was a relatively small eruption, and that it was driven by super-heated steam and ash, not by lava being ejected from the magma chamber. That made it much more difficult to predict.]
But now the ABC is reporting – [While there had been a rising number of small earthquakes detected at Mt Ontake since September, the eruption could not have been predicted easily, according to the Japan Meteorological Agency.]
I have looked for Japanese seismic data for Mt Ontake to no avail yet. I also wonder if they have networks of surveyed points over volcanos to detect subtle changes in topography which can precede an eruption.

One thought on “Many fatalities from eruption on Mt Ontake – what geophysical warning signs were there?”

  1. Active volcanos are individually monitored for seismic activity, gas effusions and ground movements (uplift and subsidence).

    This page holds the monthly reports of volcanic activity.

    For example, April 2014 (the latest report) has:

    Miyakejima (Alert Level: 2)… GNSS* observation data, ground deformation indicating contraction in shallow parts of the mountain began to diminish gradually in 2000 and stopped around 2013. Long-term extension of the baseline along the north-south section of Miyakejima has also been observed since 2006, indicating expansion in deeper parts.
    * GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) is a generic name for satellite positioning systems such as GPS.

    And:

    Ioto (Near-crater Warning). Data from the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI) show that the ground began subsiding in November 2013, entered an almost static state around January 2014, and then started to rising in late February. Volcanic activity is now quite high.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.