Media reports the UN saying – “Coal has no future in the world’s energy mix”
When did the UN do anything useful?
What does it cost? Was it always just another sneaky Fabian plan to promote the notion of a World Government?
Media reports the UN saying – “Coal has no future in the world’s energy mix”
When did the UN do anything useful?
What does it cost? Was it always just another sneaky Fabian plan to promote the notion of a World Government?
Watched a couple of reports yesterday about China now being the biggest CO2 emitter.
All they talked about was ‘pollution’ with shot after shot of air pollution, with a single reference to greenhouse gases toward the end, and no mention of CO2.
The sheer bald-faced dishonesty of it.
Yup! Warwick agree with the post heading. More than that we need a change to the constitution to have a clause (like Switzerland) that requires a referendum approval for any treaty. USA requires agreement by both the Congress and Senate to allow signing of any treaty or Protocol that gives authority to an outside body such as the UN (may also be in their constitution). USA could not sign the Kyoto Protocol on CO2 emission. If Australia had that then Rudd would not have had the power to sign, same with UN Human Rights and Refugee agreements. Switzerland is not a member of the EU and has not signed many of the UN agreements because they would not be agreed to by referendum. On the otherhand Switzerland has Nuclear Power approved by referendum. The people are not stupid if things are properly explained and if it is not explained they vote “No”.
Let us hope Australians are not so stupid as to divide the country on race, religion or culture if there is a referendum on Aborigines, Islam, sharia law etc.
I have much the same view as cementafriend on the signing of treaties. Their effect is to give away the right of future generations to govern themselves as a democratic country. This is on the way towards a world government, countries giving up the right to be a sovereign entity. The anti-democratic aspect of the UN is not only that non-democratic governments get equal say, it is that self selected organisations that call themselves the civil society are given prominence.
I agree with bells on yet there are sill a lot of people out there who are pushing for local governments to sign up for Agenda21.