Monthly Archives: April 2006

IPCC, News and Views

That Kyoto Is A Fraud

3 Comments

Contributed by Owen McShane

Introduction

They also save time by having the prescribed drug dosage of try these guys now buy tadalafil in canada. Be sure to get details, like the length of time you can Going Here online levitra have erections for. Only one pill should generico levitra on line be taken in one day. Tadalafil is www.glacialridgebyway.com/windows/Ambush%20Park.html generic viagra pills likewise used to treat the side effects of an augmented prostate (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-BPH).

I acknowledge that the city of Kyoto exists. Any claims to the contrary are fraudulent.

However, the protocol developed out of the IPCC conference in Kyoto is a fraud, because it is based on fraudulent assumptions, fraudulent models and fraudulent manipulations of data.

First, a few key points:

  • Climate Change is real. Claims that the climate is static and unchanging are fraudulent.
  • Claims that the burning of fossil fuels has released large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere are not fraudulent.
  • Claims that this carbon dioxide is a "pollutant" are fraudulent because carbon dioxide is a benign gas which is also a fertilizer and necessary for the growth of plants.

The United Nations International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims a consensus exists that global average temperatures may increase by 1 or 2 degrees by the end of the century. This claim is probably not fraudulent in itself.

However, most of the other IPCC assumptions, which have led to the Kyoto Protocol, are fraudulent. This necessarily means that the Kyoto protocol itself is a fraud and that our [NZ] government is the victim of a major scam.

I shall now deal with the fourteen key fraudulent items which have been used to construct the fraudulent Kyoto Protocol.

Continue reading That Kyoto Is A Fraud →

Atmospheric science, IPCC

The Royal Society and the “dead hand of consensus”

7 Comments

Contributed by Bob Foster

There is no one “contrarian view” on climate change – nor should there be. What is needed, surely, is a ferment of ideas – each judged on its intrinsic merit, and not just on the status of its proposer – to serve collectively as a contra to the dead hand of consensus, which currently strangles thinking in climate-change science. Anyone who believes that the science of climate is already resolved is either naïve, or has confused science with politics. No-one understands climate in all crucial aspects.

An eminently plausible hypothesis is that Earth does not journey in an empty universe. Neither does it enjoy a self-contained climate – stable until only now disturbed by people burning fossil fuels. Correlations suggest that the primary driver of our ever-changing climate, from the multi-millennial time-scale right down to that better called weather, is extra-terrestrial.

Crucially, the timing of future solar/planetary influences can be calculated; and if the Sun keeps playing by the rules, the next Little Ice Age cold period will be fully developed by 2030. People suffered terribly in the Maunder Minimum.

Continue reading The Royal Society and the “dead hand of consensus” →

IPCC, News and Views

“BOINCing” to Oblivion

5 Comments

In February 2005 Coolwire 11 commented on the ridiculous Oxford University based mass clinate modelling experiment where people all over the world (no doubt mainly in taxpayer-funded places) engaged thousands of PCs to run modelling software. Results were reported back to HQ and all sorts of wild speculative claims about future warming have been made in the media from late 2004 based on these dubious numbers.

Now we hear that in a massive "mea culpa", the group’s "head honcho" has had to admit to major errors in their programs.

Continue reading “BOINCing” to Oblivion →