Environmental Flows
Australia has developed this procedure for water storage dams whereby a
quota of dam water labelled "Environmental Flow" (EF) or "Environmental
Release" is periodically released to maintain wildlife values
downstream - a concept that on the face of it sounds all well and good.
The exact specifications of the releases can vary
seasonally, from dam to dam and I expect the various
States have their own guidelines too.
Andrew Bolt has an interesting blog article drawing
attention to the Victorian Govt plan to release 10GL of water into the
Yarra River at a time when the river has reached minor flood levels due
to above average rain in June. All this at a time when Melbourne
dams are only 36% full with consumers on water
restrictions - not to mention high priced water which will only
increase in price further as seawater desalination comes onstream.
Melbourne Water has a webpage tabulating Thomson Dam EF for
most of the past decade - I was very surprised to note that for the
years 2002 - 2008 - EF averaged 35%
of inflows or almost 4 times minimum EF beneath the dam. No
wonder the dam levels can not recover - the Govt is
constantly pulling the plug.
I have a blog article myself titled - Are we being conned with excessive water
charges ? which goes into the way
Australian water policies have changed over a decade in the direction
of more expensive water.
Living in Canberra I have tried to get a handle on EF as applied
to the Canberra water supply - this is not easy - the water and
electricity utility ACTEW publishes at
intervals a "Water and wastewater performance report"
(look down the left side) which gives a monthly graphic for each dam
covering maybe a year - and the EF usually exceeds the target
amount. A few ACTEW Annual reports - 2004, 2005 and 2006 have a graphic showing EF
for a few years. I can find no data in Annual Reports post 2006.
Then in the 2007 report there is a graphic showing several years of dam inflows.
Oddly for an engineering and science organisation that no units are
specified for the graphic - but we assume they are thousands of Mega
Litres ML or Giga Litres GL. So the six year average is just over
50,000 ML or 50 GL per year. ACTEW do not make it easy by
sometimes quoting data on a finacial year basis and at other times on a
calendar year but lets compare the six year of EF from 2000/2001
to 2005/2006 with the above 50 GL per year average inflow
2001-2006. The answer is 45 GL per year average
EF. So for the period of years typified by below average
rainfall the Govt is tipping 90% of inflows out as Environmental
Release - no wonder our dam levels have been dropping. Now the
average EF figure is influenced by the 2000/2001 number being 88
GL so lets take that out - the 5 year average EF is then 36.5 GL. Still
a whopping 73% of average inflows.
I wonder if the entire policy surrounding EF would stand up to proper
scrutiny.
We must remember that all our dam infrastructure has to be so much
larger and higher impact - capital and operating costs etc have
to be so much higher than they need be to cope with these extravagant
environmantal water releases.
27 July 2010